Saturday, June 4, 2011

Why study personality types?

I'm reading a really fantastic book about personality types called Personality Type in Congregations: How to Work with Others More Effectively, by Lynne M. Baab. A lot of what the author writes about could really be applied in any organizational situation, not just within church congregations, but she does address prayer and a few other particularly spiritual activities (such as worship) that are more specific to a faith based community.  

Oftentimes when I bring up personality typing (especially within our congregation) I basically get pooh poohed. The attitude is either that it's all a bunch of hocus pocus and mumbo jumbo, or there's no real value in the study and, if anything, it will just be used against people. Baab did a great job of explaining that just the opposite is true. She says there are three paths to growth relating to personality types: self-acceptance, learning to use all functions, and learning to "access the shadow" (which deals with the way we behave/think under extreme stress).

The moment of self-acceptance comes when you discover your personality type and suddenly you realize that your constant fight to be one way or another is because you're not naturally that way. God made you to be a certain way and you may feel like your parents, or your church, or your work place has expected something very different of you, something that you found it depressing to be unable to achieve. When you realize that you're introverted because that's how God made you, or that there's value in being a dreamer, or that basing your decisions on feelings isn't wrong or right, it's just how you are... then you're able to accept who you are and how you naturally operate, irregardless of what others' expectations might be. (You might also have a better sense of why they are expecting something from you that's always seemed so foreign. It's because that other person has an opposite personality trait in that area so they'd always thought they were expecting something natural of you, not realizing it was natural to them, but not to you.) Once you discover your personality type, you'll probably have a better understanding of yourself and others. This will help you to be more accepting of others when they decide or act differently than you do. But there's a lot more value to personality typing than just awareness. The next step involves growth.

Each of the functions of the Meyers-Briggs personality type system are amoral. That means they're neither right or wrong, they're just different. And there are times when one type might be more appropriate than another. For example, if someone has just gone through a traumatic or sad experience, it's unlikely that they want a Thinking type person to come up and logically explain to them the situation that they're in. What they really need then is a Feeling type person who will empathize with them in their time of need (or a Thinking person who has learned to use their Feeling side). One of the goals of those studying personality typing should not only be to
learn more about your own personality type, and to learn to value and appreciate other personality types, but also to find ways to grow in areas where you have a weakness. Not only does this help us to be more well rounded people, but we may find the stretch into an area that doesn't come naturally to us to be an exciting challenge that helps us grow closer to God (as we learn to rely more upon him in our areas of weakness) and others (as we learn to relate to people in a way that might not be as natural for us, but which helps us to connect to them more deeply). I think this is an important aspect of personality study that is often overlooked and Baab does a great job of giving examples of how people have grown in areas that were previously foreign and uncomfortable to them (like learning to be a listener when you're naturally more of a talker). 

Baab describes the third value of studying personality types as "accessing the shadow." When we are in periods of great stress, we often do our best to face the problem with our usual strengths. When those fail, or when we feel like we've exhausted our ability to deal with the situation, what often happens is that we revert to going the direct opposite route. The example that the author gives of herself was that under stress, she started to exhibit extroverted sensing behaviors (even though she's introverted and intuitive). Healthy extroverted sensing behaviors involve an enthusiastic, joyful embracing of sensory experience. But when we're in these stress modes and flip into using our "inferior function" (which means the opposite of how we'd normally behave) we end up embracing the worst possible form of that function. So in this case, instead of joyfully embracing of something sensory, she depressedly fell into a habit of over-eating. This state of relying upon our inferior function (in other words, relying on the areas we're weakest in and do the worst at) is called being "in the grip." Baab describes it as "vivid evidence that sin's power reaches deep into our souls." During these times, emotions are exposed that we'd managed to hide before. We continue to try to hide them with our inferior functioning, but Baabs encourages growth at this stage by facing our obsessions, mistakes, and failures and learning from them rather than allowing them to lead us down the road of poor behaviors. 

I've considered these first two values of studying personality type for quite awhile now, but the inferior functioning is something I've read about before, but not really delved into deeply. The description of the inferior functioning of an ISTJ (impulsiveness and catastrophizing) fit Nathan's recent behavior to a tee, though. That nearly gave me whiplash when I read it -- definitely catching my attention. Suddenly it makes a little more sense to me why my son is behaving so very differently than he's ever behaved in his life. Something in his life has caused severe stress and his only means of dealing with it has been this radical change in behavior. Baab suggests some means of helping a person get out of "the grip" but I've also noticed there's a book just on that topic. It's something I'll definitely be looking into. 

Understanding personality type is certainly not a panacea, but I've repeatedly seen situations in which it either has helped, or it could have helped if it was taken into consideration. Personality is, by definition, an incredibly personal thing. Some people don't like to be pigeon-holed or scrutinized. Others get a bit too gung ho and run with the beginning of the idea without really understanding how typing can be used beneficially and they end up doing more harm than good. I think it's helped me to be more sensitive and understanding of others. Just like any tool, typing can be helpful or harmful. It's a tool that I've found great value in, both in understanding myself and the actions and beliefs of those around me. Baab is a good writer and does a great job of giving specific benefits and goals of using personality typing within congregations. 

12 comments:

  1. got to come back to this and re-read the bit about the "inferior functioning" - need to try and get my head round that bit.

    the other stuff - yes! and you've explained it really well here. The more I understand about personality types the better I understand myself and learn to accept myself as I am. It also helps me to understand other people who are different to me, and accept them as they are. So everybody wins.

    ReplyDelete
  2. oh goody! my dad loaned me this book a few years ago and it was so helpful to me. For me, it was the (in retrospect quite obvious) idea that a church, like an individual, has a personality. Suddenly it made sense to me why I felt so not-at-home in my church as an INFJ... attending an ESFP church! Just knowing that fact (even not knowing what to do about it) has been helpful, and not get my knickers in a wad (at least not as much) when we have the church backrub-and-prayer sort of thing we had today.

    (it also helped to realize that the lady next to me was in grateful tears over the same touchy-feely thing that was making me grind my teeth. I actually sang the words to "sweet sweet Spirit" for her sake, instead of folding my arms and pouting. But since I just told you... shoot! there goes my reward in Heaven!)

    I haven't wrapped my brain around the "minor functioning" thing AT ALL. I don't know how it does or would apply to me and to what I do or need to do. I don't know what being "in the grip" looks like for me.

    Some of the minor functioning thing bothered me a little, to be honest, because it seemed prescriptive where it shouldn't be. Like I felt with the Enneagram (though not nearly as strongly!) it seemed like it was prescribing a spiritual path rather than simply describing differences between people, and that's a very dangerous thing to be doing - stepping in front of God with directions for another person.

    I wish you could come over for tea and we could discuss it. My thoughts keep skittering in all different directions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. there's a book on that, although the guy ignored E/I saying it didn't matter. so churches were only STJ or NFJ or whatever. kinda weird. don't know why he did that.

    i think i'm the sole N in our congregation. there's a bit of variation in the other areas, but i can't figure out anyone that's an N.

    ReplyDelete
  4. that's bizarre, to ignore E/I. Our church is sooooo obviously extraverted, and it's such a significant part of how we do things, in both good and bad ways!

    I think there's three, maybe four N's in our church... one is me, and one is Daniel. No N's in the church board, though. Sigh.

    I'm starting to wonder if intuition is related to the gift of prophecy somehow... not meaning future-telling, but pointing out the often-painful truth. Seeing that sort of truth seems like an iNtuitive thing... and unwelcome as ever. Though maybe in this case it's just because I'm in the minority, and acting as balance since I'm probably the most outspoken N in the group. Maybe an S in an N church would be a prophet in a different sort of way?

    ReplyDelete
  5. i can't believe you just said that! i was just thinking about that this past weekend.

    i think an S in an N church would be the one calling people back to the creed, confessions, how things have been done in the past, etc. ... they'd probably be reminding them not to forget their first love.

    but i totally agree that N's seem to see patterns in the church. i feel like our church doesn't have a very good sense of themselves. (and they don't seem to feel the need to have a good sense of themselves, either.) nor do they have any vision for what they could be as a people. i have all sorts of thoughts on who we are and where we could be headed, but there's not really any means for me to say anything.

    rob was just reading a passage from 1 corinthians this past weekend that included prophesy in a list of things that should be taking place in the church. his assumption was that that was part of the pastor's role. but i've never gotten that sense from scripture, that it's a role for a specific titled position. instead it struck me that it's probably the role of the people in the church who can see the church well and can see where it's headed, or where it could be headed.

    our congregation is pretty good at looking back. we have a good sense of where we've been. but that's also pretty S. and when they look back, they only see the good and they don't see the troubles within the congregation except for specific blowups that took place.

    i'm very curious to know how you're the outspoken one in the church. what do you say? who do you say it to? how do you say it (in email? letters? in person?) i feel like we might sorta have a time in our meetings when i could say something (we have a sharing time.) but i don't feel like what i say is actually received. (i've said stuff in the past, primarily by reading quotes from a book i'm reading, but it's rarely if ever talked about after that, and i feel like this sort of thing can't just be said, but it needs to be talked about and understood and verified.)

    and yeah, our congregation is very I at this point. we have only a couple of E's but their influence is constrained. (one travels a lot, one is a nurse and sometimes works on sundays, and one is an E, but she's more of a follower than a leader). i'd like to talk to the author about it at some point. i've emailed with him a bit (i can't even remember why. ... maybe i asked him to come speak at our church.) but i didn't ask him stuff like that.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think I agree with your thoughts of the role of an S in an N church. And that does seem to be some of the role of prophecy too - to call people back to what they already know, to remember what they've already promised. Hmm, actually it sounds SJ rather than just S. Maybe an SP's role would be to remind people of God's love and forgiveness and that we don't need to be bogged down by guilt at not doing everything right - we can just enjoy the freedom He has given us!

    I don't at all see prophecy as a leader's role - in fact I see it as sort of necessary, in an odd way, to have the prophet be outside the "official" leadership circle - as a sort of independent voice. Like John the Baptist, or Elijah... it's interesting to me that John didn't simply become Jesus' disciple, but stayed off to the side pointing to Jesus. And Elijah didn't join Obadiah's hidden company of prophets, but stayed in the wilderness much of the time... and in the OT most of the prophets weren't kings, nor vice versa.

    I'll have to email you re: my church and being outspoken - doesn't seem to be an appropriate thing for me to talk about in public - though I doubt any of my church family knows you or would stumble on your blog. give me a few days...

    ReplyDelete
  7. good point.

    and yeah, it's probably more SJ. i don't have a very good handle on what it means to be SP.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I've never thought of a possible connection between spiritual gifts and personality types - not quite sure I agree, as my experience is that God can plonk a gift onto someone and it's nothing to do with what they're like naturally, it just suddenly descends on you and you look in wonder and amazement and think: wow, I can't believe this is me doing this stuff, it's so not me.

    totally agree about prophecy not being tied to leadership in the church, being a prophet as I understand it means you get messages from God and your job is to pass them on. if it's a message for the church then the church leadership should then weigh it and see if it seems right - because it is entirely possible for a person to hear God wrong. (something I've learned the hard way)

    ReplyDelete
  9. my hunch is that type is, generally, somewhat related to gifting - but that God also made us all fantastically unique - like he made trees. Cones are typically found on evergreen needle-bearing trees, but then there's the tamarack, whose needles fall off in the winter. or the ginkgo, which really beats all typical categorization. It wouldn't surprise me if (as a general rule) the gift of prophecy had a correlation with intuition, or if the gift of mercy correlated with Feeling.

    BUT even if that is the case, that doesn't prohibit God from breaking the pattern freely as he sees fit. And I don't think types should be used to 'diagnose' gifts.

    Maybe intuition makes a person prone to LONG for, and ASK for, the gift of prophecy. I know I've asked for it often, because many times I see that SOMEthing is wrong, and because I long for God's word to speak into the chaos. Where does the personality leave off and the gift begin? I don't know.

    ReplyDelete
  10. my jury is still out on how gifts and types relate. baab presents several theories in her book from various folks who have tried to sort the matter out. i think i'm fine with not knowing.

    and if a gift is something from God that comes, poof, out of nowhere (as it very well might be) then i don't think tests for gifts makes any sense. any time you're testing for a gift you really are just testing for a type, imo. if you believe gifts poof, then you can't test for a poof. in fact, a test would show you exactly what gift will not be poofing in since it's already there.

    ReplyDelete
  11. yes, I'm also fine with not knowing exactly how it all works. I think it's all a bit of a mixture. There are areas where God works with what we've already got, and then there are times when he gives us something new - or even something just for a time. like Kelly said, God is free to break patterns as he sees fit. My experience is that he does. This actually helps me sometimes to recognise when God is working through me, because I know the way I'm behaving is totally not me.

    testing for a gift - now that's interesting, there was a questionnaire my pastor back home used, ticking boxes and then adding stuff up to work out what your primary gifting might be, but from the kind of questions listed I could see that what it was showing was what gifting I was already using, it couldn't really give much clue as to what might be buried inside me, unrecognised.

    ReplyDelete