Between Steve's
post on leadership in AA, his follow up post on
authority, and the fact that the pastor and one of the elders is coming over to our house this afternoon for a chat, I've been thinking a fair bit about leadership in the church. I think we often have expectations of those in leadership and we don't always think out clearly what those expectations are and whether or not they're even reasonable expectations to have. (Our leaders are, after all, only human.)
As I've already alluded to (
here and
here), I've been struggling with the leadership at our church. It's been an ongoing problem for several years now and I think I've grown re-discouraged about it lately because I thought things would change with the entrance of a new pastor, and they haven't. But as I prepare for our meeting, I keep asking myself, what is reasonable to expect? Where do I have expectations that I either haven't expressed to them, or that I'm out of line to expect? And the real problem, of course, is that I have a lot of energy behind this, so the ultimate question is, "How can I go into this meeting in a way that addresses the issues without going overboard, without showing bitterness, and without causing more hurt than already exists in the problem?"
So what
should I expect from our church leaders? What is reasonable? What should they be doing?
Our pastor actually posted some answers to that question, quoting extensively both from John Piper and the Bible. Here's the passage Piper preached on:
Therefore, I exhort the elders among you, as your fellow elder and witness of the sufferings of Christ, and a partaker also of the glory that is to be revealed, shepherd the flock of God among you, exercising oversight not under compulsion, but voluntarily, according to the will of God; and not for sordid gain, but with eagerness; nor yet as lording it over those allotted to your charge, but proving to be examples to the flock. -- 1 Peter 1:1-3
So they should be shepherds, voluntarily, not for gain but with eagerness, not lording it over the flock but as examples. But my idea of "shepherd" might be very different than someone else's idea of "shepherd." Piper describes being as shepherd in this way - "God holds them accountable for seeing the big picture and acting for the good of the whole flock." I have no idea if the elders of our church see any picture, let alone see the big one. And I'm not really sure what they're doing to "act for the good of the whole flock." If a tree falls in a forest and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound? If the elders meet and see things and act on things but no one ever knows they've seen or acted, does it make any difference?
Like I said last week, I still think our church is a good thing over all. It's a great bunch of people who truly do want to follow through on their decision to follow the Christ. But just because something is good doesn't mean it's easy. I'd love to hear your thoughts on church leaders and what is reasonable to expect from them.